Trust in Flesh And Leaves

One of the worst phrases in the English language is, ‘Do you believe everything that you read?’ To me, that’s like saying, do you believe your friends?

I cannot see how one who bandies that phrase can have known many critical books or have many good friends, for that matter.

Trust in books, as with good friends, begins with trust in oneself.

Some of my best friends are good books. I trust them and their authors as I trust my good friends, because I trust myself in choosing them both.

A friend is a source of spirit, challenge, and understanding. If your books are not providing those things, you’re reading the wrong ones. If your friends are not providing those things, likewise you  have the wrong friends.

Some might say friends-and books-should provide enchantment, agreement, and benefit, and surely they sometimes provide these things, but when in a relationship of communion, these things are the outcome of spirit, challenge, and understanding-all of which grow from truth, which stems both from you and the friend, through intelligence, and benevolence.

I don’t need to know everything about a friend, certainly not right away- to trust him.  

It’s the same with books. I trust good books because I am honest, and kind, and intelligent with myself, and so I recognize these qualities in their pages, as I trust the flesh and mind of a human friend.

I don’t try to get all I can out of a friend and finish with him, seeking new friends. I establish a life-long relationship with him. I return to him from time to time and experience-as a result of our meeting- soulfulness in me,  in him, and between us; not use. 

It’s the same with good books.  I do not read them cover to cover as fast as possible, discarding them in some obsessive quest to give myself a sense that “I finish what I start”, racing through them with a sense of esteem, as if trying to make it to a finish-line, or like a boy with a bag of cookies, who can’t leave some for later. It’s more like enjoying- even getting acquainted with-a box of gourmet dark chocolates, or a bottle of fine wine. 

One returns again and again, over time, to a good friend, be he man or binding & pages, taking pleasure in renewed novelty, relief after longing, and the refining of one’s feelings and perspectives through meditation and insight, between encounters with one’s friend.

Reading a book slowly, like meeting a friend over the years, deepens and broadens one’s sophistication, taste and maturity.

Having a friend-in a book or person-is having a conversation;  a relationship based on long term emotional and intellectual communion. It’s not an affair, based on short-term selfish needs. 

Having a trusting relationship with myself is what gives me the confidence to choose friendships, in people and books. That’s how I can trust in whom I befriend, and in what I read.  As my life-long friend, Professor Adam Hoffman once said, “You have to read with confidence.”

Photo/Poetry: Dazafu, Nihon

Loneliness isn’t temporal
Lonelihood isn’t personal
Neither these are spatial

Though they slow the minute hand

They accelerate the hour

When many be around me

And the second hand ticks loudly

“CHEUT!”…

“CHEUT!”…

“CHEUT!”…

Lonely’s mother’s a neighborhood, that’s ugly, unmoving, rowdy…

For when one moves my spirit, I talk to those around me

And Lonely’s but a phantom
And numbers a decoration

And ugliness is homeless
And another uncultured dream

Carl Atteniese

Letter: The 2012 Presidential Election

To:
Patrick Gaspard
Executive Director
Democratic National Committee

I wax ‘polantic’ (politically romantic) that one day, America will do away with the presidential race as a false solution to choosing proper policy and humanistic and egalitarian ethical leadership.

What I envision is the people and the legislative branches voting the issues, and along party lines those issues would define both party and plan for the nation.

(The life-term for Supreme Court justices must end, too. This solution to the framer’s supposed fears of executive strength are undermined by planting ideologues at the helm of our nation’s judicial thinking and decision-making.)

Back to my dream; simultaneously and by coincidence, as a plan-based campaign and convention-style debate would ensue, appropriate leaders would emerge. After a vote by the people, a winning plan for foreign and domestic policies would have won and it’s authors automatically go into the executive branch.

But that’s a fantasy, for now.

I am fed up with American politics. Self-appointed moral idiots like Palin and Bachman have no place in American politics. Palin is a poster girl for fashion and Bush-era sensibilities and Bachman is a totalitarian by nature of her biblical slant. Neither of them are worthy of being the leaders of the free world.

France, Japan, and I would guess Germany have governments peopled by educated, cosmopolitan, and highly sophisticated individuals. France has a government of scientists!

We elect Tom, Dick, and Harry, and get numbskull government with a biblical ferocity of the old testament, while good men such as Pawlenty and Obama are trashed because they are gentlemen.

We cannot let this election be a Willy Horton Attack-style free-for all. Real issues that boil down to the fate of our species are at stake, now.

Palin wants to drill the hell out of the earth. Bachman has no respect for religious diversity, or the founding principles of our country. She’s a theocrat. Romney wants to eliminate Medicare. Perry seems to be a clone. Paul was interesting to me, but his ideas are like Jerry Brown’s and JFK’s. He’ll be lame duck or shot.

Creation damn their pathetic efforts and let’s roll up our sleeves and put these types on the trash heap with Bush, Reagan, and Nixon.

Sincerely,
Carl Atteniese
My twitter is: carlatteniese

Warm Light & Tea Space

Peace, Love, Joy, & Veganism,
Carl ATTENIESE

My website is: http://carlatteniese.com
My twitter is: carlatteniese
Copyright Carl Atteniese
(All Rights Reserved).